May 2024
At Hive Five, the arrival of grandchildren infuses the air with a freshness akin to the first breath of spring. This May, the house buzzed with a particular vibrancy as Fushcia and Hyacinth graced us with their presence. Their mother, a connoisseur of fine wines, entrusted them to our care on her journey to Rufford Abbey. There, amidst the serene cloisters, she was to indulge in the monks’ latest vintage—a task befitting her role as the esteemed sommelier of the Toasty Red Toad. Nestled in Bray, this culinary gem boasts a Michelin star, a testament to its gastronomic excellence, and offers patrons a picturesque view of the River Thames—a view that, much like the wine she expertly selects, is both timeless and invigorating.
In the quietude of my study, where the dust motes dance in the slanting sunlight, I find a profound joy in the visits of these two young minds. Their arrival is a herald of curiosity and challenge, a refreshing deviation from the passive consumption of television’s flickering images. We delve into the realm of mathematics, a universe governed by logic and beauty. Their adeptness at mathematics is not merely impressive; it is a testament to the boundless potential of youthful intellect. At the tender age of six, their grasp of trigonometry—a field where angles converse in whispers and shapes reveal their secrets—is astonishing. It would indeed pose a formidable challenge to any nine-year-old, steeped in the conventional progression of learning.
Our sessions are a forage of exploration and discovery, garnishing the forest of numbers and equations. We traverse the landscape of mathematical concepts, where each problem solved is a peak conquered, each theorem understood a horizon expanded. The air is thick with the scent of pencil shavings and the soft scratch of graphite on paper is our soundtrack. There is a beauty in the furrowed brows and the light of understanding that dawns in their eyes—a beauty that transcends the aesthetic and touches upon the sublime.
In these moments, I am reminded of the great mathematicians who came before us, those who charted the unknown with nothing but parchment, quill, and an insatiable thirst for knowledge. We stand on the shoulders of these giants, gazing out at a world made more comprehensible through their efforts. And as I guide these young prodigies through the intricate dance of numbers, I am filled with hope. Hope that they will carry this torch of inquiry and wonder, that they will not be content with the world as it is presented to them but will seek to uncover the underlying truths that govern our existence.
For in the end, mathematics is more than just a subject to be learned—it is a language to be spoken, a lens through which to view the world, a tool to shape the future. And these two, with their precocious talent and unquenchable curiosity, are well on their way to mastering it. They are not just learning mathematics; they are learning to think, to question, to dream. And in this, I find an indescribable fulfilment, for there is no greater legacy than to ignite the spark of learning in another, and to watch as it grows into a flame that illuminates the darkness.
The Navier-Stokes equations, a set of partial differential equations that describe the motion of viscous fluid substances, such as liquids and gases, stand as a proof to the intricate dance between mathematics and physics. These equations, which have perplexed mathematicians and scientists alike since their inception in the 19th century, encapsulate the fundamental principles of fluid dynamics. The challenge lies not just in solving these equations but in proving the existence and smoothness of solutions under all conditions. The Millennium Prize, a beacon of recognition and reward, awaits the intellectual pioneer who can navigate through this complex labyrinth of variables and calculations to provide a comprehensive solution. It is a problem that bridges the gap between theoretical mathematics and practical applications, from predicting weather patterns to designing aerodynamic vehicles, making its resolution not just a theoretical triumph but a milestone with real-world impact.
In the realm of mathematical enigmas, the Navier-Stokes existence and smoothness problem stands as a formidable hurdle, challenging the most astute minds to unravel its complexities. This problem, which delves into the very heart of fluid dynamics, seeks to understand the conditions under which the equations governing fluid flow are well-behaved and possess solutions that are smooth and continuous. The equations themselves, named after Claude-Louis Navier and George Gabriel Stokes, encapsulate the principles of conservation of momentum, mass, and energy within a fluid, be it a gas or a liquid.
The pursuit of this problem is not merely an academic exercise; it holds profound implications for a multitude of practical applications, from predicting weather patterns and designing aerodynamic vehicles to understanding the flow of blood in the human body and the turbulent churning of oceans. The Clay Mathematics Institute, recognising the pivotal role of this problem in both mathematics and the physical sciences, has deemed it worthy of inclusion in its Millennium Prize Problems—a collection of the most vexing and significant unsolved problems in mathematics.
The allure of the Navier-Stokes problem is not solely in the intellectual triumph of solving it but also in the tantalizing incentive of a US$1,000,000 prize. This reward, however, is not a mere bounty on the head of a mathematical beast; it is a testament to the value and importance of the problem. It serves as a beacon, drawing in diverse thinkers from across the globe, each bringing their unique perspectives and insights in hopes of achieving a breakthrough.
As one delves into the intricacies of the Navier-Stokes equations, one must navigate the delicate interplay between the non-linear terms that represent the convective acceleration within the fluid and the viscous terms that embody the internal friction. The challenge lies in proving whether these equations, under all conditions, yield solutions that remain finite and do not succumb to singularities—points at which the mathematical description breaks down.
The journey toward solving the Navier-Stokes problem is a tribute to the collaborative spirit of the mathematical community. It is a journey that transcends geographical boundaries and unites researchers in a shared quest for knowledge. Each attempt, whether it culminates in success or not, contributes to a deeper understanding of the problem and paves the way for future explorations.
In my own stumbling’s, I have grappled with the subtleties of the Navier-Stokes equations, seeking to discern patterns and structures that might hint at a path to resolution. The work is meticulous and often daunting, requiring a synthesis of analytical techniques, numerical methods, and theoretical insights. Yet, it is work that is driven by a profound sense of curiosity and a relentless pursuit of truth.
As I reflect on the day’s efforts, I am reminded that the journey is as important as the destination. Each day spent unravelling the mysteries of the Navier-Stokes problem is a day spent pushing the boundaries of human knowledge. It is a pursuit that embodies the very essence of scientific inquiry: the relentless drive to understand the universe and our place within it.
The specific statement of the problem that the Clay Mathematics Institute asks to prove or give a counter-example of is:
“In three space dimensions and time, given an initial velocity field, there exists a vector velocity and a scalar pressure field, which are both smooth and globally defined, that solve the Navier-Stokes equations.”
In the quiet of the early morning, our minds, fertile with curiosity and unburdened by the day’s distractions, embarked on a journey through the realms of trigonometry and its applications to the enigmatic Navier-Stokes equations. Hyacinth, with a discerning eye, posited that the labyrinthine solutions to these equations might well intertwine with complex numbers, which, when unfurled in polar coordinates, reveal their trigonometric essence. Fushcia, in a gesture of concord, acknowledged this insight, and together we delved into the potential illumination offered by the Graham Number, a beacon that could guide us through the mathematical morass.
As the discourse meandered, I introduced the concept of Fourier series and transforms, those mathematical chameleons that adapt to the rhythms of trigonometric functions, offering a prism through which differential equations, such as our formidable Navier-Stokes, might be not just solved but transmuted into a more tractable form within the frequency domain. Fushcia, ever the sceptic, arched an eyebrow in doubt, yet it was Hyacinth who, perceiving the depth of this approach, embraced it, enriching our collective toolbox.
This segue into Fourier analysis naturally segued into a discussion on the articulation of boundary conditions, those silent sentinels that define the limits of our mathematical landscapes, particularly when faced with problems adorned with periodic or oscillatory frontiers. Such conditions stand sentinel at the gates of resolution for the Navier-Stokes equations, their importance as pivotal as the equations themselves.
In application, where fluid dynamics plays out its complex choreography, the Cartesian stage often gives way to the more versatile arenas of cylindrical and spherical coordinates. Here, Fushcia, with her adroit command of these systems, demonstrated how the intricate relationships between variables are elegantly expressed through the language of trigonometric functions, a testament to the harmonious interplay between mathematical concepts and their physical manifestations.
Hence, our morning’s brainstorm, far from being a mere academic exercise, was brilliance: the power of collaborative thought and the unyielding quest for understanding that drives us. It was a reminder that in the vast expanse of mathematical inquiry, it is not just the solutions we seek, but the profound connections and insights that emerge along the way, sculpting our intellectual landscape with every thoughtful probe and every shared revelation.
Hyacinth captured the essence of our morning’s analytical session with eloquence. She highlighted that while trigonometry serves as a valuable instrument in dissecting the Navier-Stokes equations, the true enigma lies not in the pursuit of particular solutions. Rather, it is the quest to establish the consistent existence and smoothness of solutions across various fluid dynamics scenarios that remains an unresolved challenge. This intricate issue transcends the boundaries of a solitary mathematical strategy, beckoning a multifaceted approach to unravel its complexities. Her insightful commentary resonated with the profound understanding that the conundrum of the Navier-Stokes equations is emblematic of the intricate connectiveness of mathematics itself.
As we delved into our task, Hyacinth’s voice broke the silence, “Grandfather, observe the mice.”
Absorbed in thought, I corrected, “Observe closely, dear, it is a solitary mouse.”
Puzzlement furrowed her brow. “And why is that?”
“Well, ‘mice’ implies a multitude, whereas a single entity warrants ‘mouse’.”
“Could you elucidate ‘multitude’?”
“Certainly, it signifies more than a singular existence. ‘Mouse’ is to one as ‘mice’ is to many.”
Nodding, she grasped the concept. Our investigation continued, manipulating a Cartesian plane into a spherical form—an intriguing exercise, albeit fruitless in the end.
In unison, as if by some twin telepathy, Fushcia and Hyacinth inquired, “May we proceed, Grandfather? We shall engage in a game of ‘mice’.”
Amused, I responded, “A delightful idea, yet ‘mice’ suggests several, not one.”
Their laughter echoed, “Fear not, Grandfather, though there is but one mouse we embrace ‘mice’ in our game; it simply sounds more enchanting.”
And with that, they scampered away, leaving me to ponder the whimsical nature of children’s logic, a refreshing divergence from the rigid structures of our work. It was a reminder that in the realm of imagination, even the rules of language could be bent, much like the coordinates we attempted to shape into new dimensions.
A beginning is the time for taking the most delicate care that the balances are correct. 
Leave a comment